![]() ![]() We actually redirect them to a page that lets them know they have been blocked for abuse. The main thing that comes to mind is blocking certain people of a specific amount of time. ![]() I wouldn't care if the list is dynamic or not, but having a timeout feature on certain things such as entries in an address lists would be very nice and useful to us. This is all true, but look on this this way - you can use firewall to add entries dynamically, you detect these abuses using it, so there is no difference, once detected, address is added to list as dynamic with time-out value set, so make firewall in a way, that user can attempt abuse every 30 minutes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |